Ghana vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Ghana
1,175 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
1,083 current US$
in 2020
Ghana rank
32nd
Zambia rank
35th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Ghana
- Zambia
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 1,175 current US$ against 1,083 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 92 current US$.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.
Ghana ranks 32nd and Zambia ranks 35th of 116 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 146.94 current US$ | 253.73 current US$ | 106.8 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2000s | 120.79 current US$ | 1,335 current US$ | 1,215 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 429.86 current US$ | 2,049 current US$ | 1,619 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 1,175 current US$ | 1,083 current US$ | 91.59 current US$ | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Ghana or Zambia?
- Ghana, at 1,175 current US$ against 1,083 current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Ghana and Zambia?
- 92 current US$, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Ghana and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Ghana ranks 32nd and Zambia ranks 35th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.