Georgia vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Georgia
1,072 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
1,083 current US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
36th
Zambia rank
35th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Georgia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 1,083 current US$ against 1,072 current US$ in Georgia, a difference of 11 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.
Georgia ranks 36th and Zambia ranks 35th of 116 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.9 current US$ | 253.73 current US$ | 215.84 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2000s | 117.69 current US$ | 1,335 current US$ | 1,218 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 461.84 current US$ | 2,049 current US$ | 1,587 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 1,072 current US$ | 1,083 current US$ | 11.02 current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Georgia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 1,083 current US$ against 1,072 current US$ in Georgia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Georgia and Zambia?
- 11 current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Georgia ranks 36th and Zambia ranks 35th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.