Finland vs Togo: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Finland
1,365 current US$
in 2020
Togo
1,491 current US$
in 2020
Finland rank
29th
Togo rank
27th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Finland
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 1,491 current US$ against 1,365 current US$ in Finland, a difference of 126 current US$.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 29th and Togo ranks 27th of 116 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 66.9 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 66.9 current US$ | Finland |
| 2000s | 240.38 current US$ | 209.41 current US$ | 30.97 current US$ | Finland |
| 2010s | 757.28 current US$ | 557.56 current US$ | 199.72 current US$ | Finland |
| 2020s | 1,365 current US$ | 1,491 current US$ | 126.1 current US$ | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Finland or Togo?
- Togo, at 1,491 current US$ against 1,365 current US$ in Finland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Finland and Togo?
- 126 current US$, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Togo?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Togo rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Finland ranks 29th and Togo ranks 27th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.