Finland vs Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Finland
1,365 current US$
in 2020
Guinea
1,378 current US$
in 2020
Finland rank
29th
Guinea rank
28th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Finland
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 1,378 current US$ against 1,365 current US$ in Finland, a difference of 13 current US$.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea ahead.
Finland ranks 29th and Guinea ranks 28th of 116 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Guinea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 66.9 current US$ | 360.78 current US$ | 293.88 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2000s | 240.38 current US$ | 337.25 current US$ | 96.87 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2010s | 757.28 current US$ | 693.73 current US$ | 63.54 current US$ | Finland |
| 2020s | 1,365 current US$ | 1,378 current US$ | 12.72 current US$ | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Finland or Guinea?
- Guinea, at 1,378 current US$ against 1,365 current US$ in Finland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Finland and Guinea?
- 13 current US$, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Guinea?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Guinea rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Finland ranks 29th and Guinea ranks 28th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.