Ecuador vs Philippines: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals

Ecuador
298.61 current US$
in 2020
Philippines
296.2 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
67th
Philippines rank
68th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time

  • Ecuador
  • Philippines
0100200300199520072020

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 298.61 current US$ against 296.2 current US$ in Philippines, a difference of 2.41 current US$.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Philippines ahead.

Ecuador ranks 67th and Philippines ranks 68th of 116 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Philippines Difference Ahead
1990s 25.84 current US$ 57.04 current US$ 31.21 current US$ Philippines
2000s 42.26 current US$ 98.64 current US$ 56.38 current US$ Philippines
2010s 93.64 current US$ 214.16 current US$ 120.52 current US$ Philippines
2020s 298.61 current US$ 296.2 current US$ 2.41 current US$ Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Ecuador or Philippines?
Ecuador, at 298.61 current US$ against 296.2 current US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Ecuador and Philippines?
2.41 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Philippines?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Philippines rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
Ecuador ranks 67th and Philippines ranks 68th of 116 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Philippines: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-current-us/ecuador/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-current-us/ecuador/philippines/">Ecuador vs Philippines: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
116 places, 2,824 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed