Congo vs Italy: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Congo
3.35 current US$
in 2017
Italy
3.38 current US$
in 2011
Congo rank
100th
Italy rank
99th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Congo
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 3.38 current US$ against 3.35 current US$ in Congo, a difference of 0.03 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 100th and Italy ranks 99th of 116 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38.21 current US$ | 0.9063 current US$ | 37.3 current US$ | Congo |
| 2000s | 1.5 current US$ | 0.7168 current US$ | 0.7828 current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 5.52 current US$ | 2.75 current US$ | 2.77 current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Congo or Italy?
- Italy, at 3.38 current US$ against 3.35 current US$ in Congo as of 2011.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Congo and Italy?
- 0.03 current US$, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Italy?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Congo and Italy rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Congo ranks 100th and Italy ranks 99th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.