Congo vs Denmark: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Congo
3.35 current US$
in 2017
Denmark
4.08 current US$
in 2013
Congo rank
100th
Denmark rank
97th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Congo
- Denmark
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 4.08 current US$ against 3.35 current US$ in Congo, a difference of 0.73 current US$.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 100th and Denmark ranks 97th of 116 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.76 current US$ | 9.81 current US$ | 7.05 current US$ | Denmark |
| 2010s | 4.26 current US$ | 5.76 current US$ | 1.5 current US$ | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Congo or Denmark?
- Denmark, at 4.08 current US$ against 3.35 current US$ in Congo as of 2013.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Congo and Denmark?
- 0.73 current US$, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Denmark?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Congo and Denmark rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Congo ranks 100th and Denmark ranks 97th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.