China vs Panama: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
China
426.4 current US$
in 2020
Panama
459.61 current US$
in 2020
China rank
62nd
Panama rank
59th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- China
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 459.61 current US$ against 426.4 current US$ in China, a difference of 33.21 current US$.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1996 it was China ahead.
China ranks 62nd and Panama ranks 59th of 116 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 85.79 current US$ | 7.81 current US$ | 77.98 current US$ | China |
| 2000s | 113.88 current US$ | 37.27 current US$ | 76.61 current US$ | China |
| 2010s | 420.99 current US$ | 103.03 current US$ | 317.96 current US$ | China |
| 2020s | 426.4 current US$ | 459.61 current US$ | 33.21 current US$ | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, China or Panama?
- Panama, at 459.61 current US$ against 426.4 current US$ in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between China and Panama?
- 33.21 current US$, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Panama?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2020.
- How do China and Panama rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- China ranks 62nd and Panama ranks 59th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.