China vs Montenegro: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
China
426.4 current US$
in 2020
Montenegro
354.18 current US$
in 2020
China rank
62nd
Montenegro rank
65th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- China
- Montenegro
How they compare
China currently reports 426.4 current US$ against 354.18 current US$ in Montenegro, a difference of 72.22 current US$.
That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was China ahead.
China ranks 62nd and Montenegro ranks 65th of 116 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 350.96 current US$ | 162.13 current US$ | 188.82 current US$ | China |
| 2010s | 420.99 current US$ | 305.61 current US$ | 115.37 current US$ | China |
| 2020s | 426.4 current US$ | 354.18 current US$ | 72.22 current US$ | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, China or Montenegro?
- China, at 426.4 current US$ against 354.18 current US$ in Montenegro as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between China and Montenegro?
- 72.22 current US$, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do China and Montenegro rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- China ranks 62nd and Montenegro ranks 65th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.