Chad vs Sri Lanka: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Chad
0.1202 current US$
in 2016
Sri Lanka
0 current US$
in 2020
Chad rank
109th
Sri Lanka rank
111th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Chad
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0.1202 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.1202 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 109th and Sri Lanka ranks 111th of 116 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3606 current US$ | 3.33 current US$ | 2.97 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.1867 current US$ | 2.53 current US$ | 2.34 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Chad or Sri Lanka?
- Chad, at 0.1202 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2016.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Chad and Sri Lanka?
- 0.1202 current US$, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Sri Lanka?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.
- How do Chad and Sri Lanka rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Chad ranks 109th and Sri Lanka ranks 111th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.