Austria vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Austria
479.93 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
463.54 current US$
in 2020
Austria rank
56th
Serbia rank
58th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Austria
- Serbia
How they compare
Austria currently reports 479.93 current US$ against 463.54 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 16.39 current US$.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 56th and Serbia ranks 58th of 116 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 273.7 current US$ | 67.56 current US$ | 206.14 current US$ | Austria |
| 2010s | 374.56 current US$ | 416.55 current US$ | 42 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 479.93 current US$ | 463.54 current US$ | 16.39 current US$ | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Austria or Serbia?
- Austria, at 479.93 current US$ against 463.54 current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Austria and Serbia?
- 16.39 current US$, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Austria and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Austria ranks 56th and Serbia ranks 58th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.