Argentina vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals

Argentina
772.3 current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina
761.96 current US$
in 2020
Argentina rank
40th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
41st

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time

  • Argentina
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520072020

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 772.3 current US$ against 761.96 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 10.34 current US$.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 40th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 41st of 116 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
1990s 13.16 current US$ 8.44 current US$ 4.72 current US$ Argentina
2000s 205.01 current US$ 341.9 current US$ 136.9 current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 914.52 current US$ 696.12 current US$ 218.4 current US$ Argentina
2020s 772.3 current US$ 761.96 current US$ 10.34 current US$ Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Argentina or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Argentina, at 772.3 current US$ against 761.96 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Argentina and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
10.34 current US$, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Argentina and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
Argentina ranks 40th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 41st of 116 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals. Statizoid. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-current-us/argentina/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-current-us/argentina/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Argentina vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
116 places, 2,824 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed