Panama vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver

Panama
42.04 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
31.57 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Panama rank
9th
Papua New Guinea rank
11th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver over time

  • Panama
  • Papua New Guinea
406080100120199520072020

How they compare

Panama currently reports 42.04 real chained 2019 US$ against 31.57 real chained 2019 US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 10.47 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.3 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Panama ranks 9th and Papua New Guinea ranks 11th of 138 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 67.07 real chained 2019 US$ 103.01 real chained 2019 US$ 35.95 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 57.75 real chained 2019 US$ 71.44 real chained 2019 US$ 13.69 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 47.87 real chained 2019 US$ 43.8 real chained 2019 US$ 4.08 real chained 2019 US$ Panama
2020s 42.04 real chained 2019 US$ 31.57 real chained 2019 US$ 10.47 real chained 2019 US$ Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver, Panama or Papua New Guinea?
Panama, at 42.04 real chained 2019 US$ against 31.57 real chained 2019 US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver between Panama and Papua New Guinea?
10.47 real chained 2019 US$, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Panama and Papua New Guinea rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver?
Panama ranks 9th and Papua New Guinea ranks 11th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-silver-real-chained-2019-us/panama/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-silver-real-chained-2019-us/panama/papua-new-guinea/">Panama vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
138 places, 3,559 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed