Burkina Faso vs New Zealand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver

Burkina Faso
0.7094 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
New Zealand
0.8006 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Burkina Faso rank
39th
New Zealand rank
38th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • New Zealand
05101520199520072020

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.8006 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.7094 real chained 2019 US$ in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.0912 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 39th and New Zealand ranks 38th of 138 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 1.95 real chained 2019 US$ 16.04 real chained 2019 US$ 14.1 real chained 2019 US$ New Zealand
2000s 1.56 real chained 2019 US$ 8.11 real chained 2019 US$ 6.55 real chained 2019 US$ New Zealand
2010s 1.06 real chained 2019 US$ 2.04 real chained 2019 US$ 0.9814 real chained 2019 US$ New Zealand
2020s 0.7094 real chained 2019 US$ 0.8006 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0912 real chained 2019 US$ New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver, Burkina Faso or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.8006 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.7094 real chained 2019 US$ in Burkina Faso as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver between Burkina Faso and New Zealand?
0.0912 real chained 2019 US$, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and New Zealand?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Burkina Faso and New Zealand rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver?
Burkina Faso ranks 39th and New Zealand ranks 38th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs New Zealand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver. Statizoid. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-silver-real-chained-2019-us/burkina-faso/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-silver-real-chained-2019-us/burkina-faso/new-zealand/">Burkina Faso vs New Zealand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
138 places, 3,559 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed