Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver
Tunisia
0.1701 current US$
in 2005
Zimbabwe
0.2685 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia rank
55th
Zimbabwe rank
52nd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver over time
- Tunisia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.2685 current US$ against 0.1701 current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0984 current US$.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.6 times Tunisia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Tunisia ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 52nd of 74 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tunisia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3002 current US$ | 0.6165 current US$ | 0.3162 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.1217 current US$ | 0.2909 current US$ | 0.1692 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver, Tunisia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.2685 current US$ against 0.1701 current US$ in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver between Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0984 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2005.
- How do Tunisia and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver?
- Tunisia ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 52nd of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.