Serbia vs Tajikistan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver
Serbia
3.88 current US$
in 2016
Tajikistan
5.25 current US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
33rd
Tajikistan rank
32nd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver over time
- Serbia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 5.25 current US$ against 3.88 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 1.37 current US$.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.4 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Serbia ranks 33rd and Tajikistan ranks 32nd of 74 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.39 current US$ | 2.04 current US$ | 0.3474 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 5.29 current US$ | 2.24 current US$ | 3.05 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver, Serbia or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 5.25 current US$ against 3.88 current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver between Serbia and Tajikistan?
- 1.37 current US$, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tajikistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Serbia and Tajikistan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver?
- Serbia ranks 33rd and Tajikistan ranks 32nd of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.