Serbia vs Spain: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver
Serbia
3.88 current US$
in 2016
Spain
3.88 current US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
33rd
Spain rank
34th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver over time
- Serbia
- Spain
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 3.88 current US$ against 3.88 current US$ in Spain, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 33rd and Spain ranks 34th of 74 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.39 current US$ | 0.4549 current US$ | 1.93 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 5.22 current US$ | 2.28 current US$ | 2.95 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver, Serbia or Spain?
- Serbia, at 3.88 current US$ against 3.88 current US$ in Spain as of 2016.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver between Serbia and Spain?
- 0 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Spain?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Serbia and Spain rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver?
- Serbia ranks 33rd and Spain ranks 34th of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.