Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver

Saudi Arabia
0.5079 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
0.2685 current US$
in 2020
Saudi Arabia rank
49th
Zimbabwe rank
52nd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Zimbabwe
0123199520072020

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.5079 current US$ against 0.2685 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.2394 current US$.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.9 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Saudi Arabia ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 52nd of 74 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9389 current US$ 0.6165 current US$ 0.3224 current US$ Saudi Arabia
2000s 0.7125 current US$ 0.2842 current US$ 0.4283 current US$ Saudi Arabia
2010s 1.02 current US$ 0.2399 current US$ 0.7769 current US$ Saudi Arabia
2020s 0.5079 current US$ 0.2685 current US$ 0.2394 current US$ Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver, Saudi Arabia or Zimbabwe?
Saudi Arabia, at 0.5079 current US$ against 0.2685 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver between Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe?
0.2394 current US$, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver?
Saudi Arabia ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 52nd of 74 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-silver-current-us/saudi-arabia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-silver-current-us/saudi-arabia/zimbabwe/">Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
74 places, 1,428 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed