Mali vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver
Mali
0 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
0 current US$
in 2020
Mali rank
67th
Zambia rank
65th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver over time
- Mali
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Mali, a difference of 0 current US$.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.8 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Zambia ahead.
Mali ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 65th of 74 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2082 current US$ | 1.17 current US$ | 0.9654 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2000s | 0.2104 current US$ | 0.9861 current US$ | 0.7757 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0.6969 current US$ | 2.25 current US$ | 1.56 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver, Mali or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Mali as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver between Mali and Zambia?
- 0 current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zambia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2020.
- How do Mali and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver?
- Mali ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 65th of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.