Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver
Kyrgyzstan
7.67 current US$
in 2020
Namibia
9.75 current US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
28th
Namibia rank
27th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 9.75 current US$ against 7.67 current US$ in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.08 current US$.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Namibia ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 28th and Namibia ranks 27th of 74 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.68 current US$ | 8.95 current US$ | 5.28 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2020s | 7.67 current US$ | 9.75 current US$ | 2.08 current US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver, Kyrgyzstan or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 9.75 current US$ against 7.67 current US$ in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver between Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 2.08 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Namibia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 28th and Namibia ranks 27th of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.