Georgia vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver
Georgia
12.95 current US$
in 2020
Namibia
9.75 current US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
25th
Namibia rank
27th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver over time
- Georgia
- Namibia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 12.95 current US$ against 9.75 current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 3.2 current US$.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Namibia ahead.
Georgia ranks 25th and Namibia ranks 27th of 74 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.51 current US$ | 11.18 current US$ | 7.67 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2020s | 12.95 current US$ | 9.75 current US$ | 3.2 current US$ | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver, Georgia or Namibia?
- Georgia, at 12.95 current US$ against 9.75 current US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver between Georgia and Namibia?
- 3.2 current US$, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Namibia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver?
- Georgia ranks 25th and Namibia ranks 27th of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.