Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver

Ecuador
0.377 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
0.2685 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
51st
Zimbabwe rank
52nd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zimbabwe
0246199520072020

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.377 current US$ against 0.2685 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1085 current US$.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.4 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Ecuador ranks 51st and Zimbabwe ranks 52nd of 74 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1942 current US$ 0.5458 current US$ 0.3516 current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 0.2122 current US$ 0.2628 current US$ 0.0506 current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 1.52 current US$ 0.2399 current US$ 1.28 current US$ Ecuador
2020s 0.377 current US$ 0.2685 current US$ 0.1085 current US$ Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
Ecuador, at 0.377 current US$ against 0.2685 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
0.1085 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
18 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver?
Ecuador ranks 51st and Zimbabwe ranks 52nd of 74 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-silver-current-us/ecuador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-silver-current-us/ecuador/zimbabwe/">Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
74 places, 1,428 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed