Ecuador vs Slovakia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver
Ecuador
0.377 current US$
in 2020
Slovakia
0.2127 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
51st
Slovakia rank
53rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver over time
- Ecuador
- Slovakia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.377 current US$ against 0.2127 current US$ in Slovakia, a difference of 0.1643 current US$.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.8 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 51st and Slovakia ranks 53rd of 74 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.08 current US$ | 0.2516 current US$ | 0.8267 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.377 current US$ | 0.2127 current US$ | 0.1644 current US$ | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver, Ecuador or Slovakia?
- Ecuador, at 0.377 current US$ against 0.2127 current US$ in Slovakia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver between Ecuador and Slovakia?
- 0.1643 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Slovakia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Slovakia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver?
- Ecuador ranks 51st and Slovakia ranks 53rd of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.