Ecuador vs Oman: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver
Ecuador
0.377 current US$
in 2020
Oman
0.5386 current US$
in 2002
Ecuador rank
51st
Oman rank
48th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver over time
- Ecuador
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 0.5386 current US$ against 0.377 current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 0.1616 current US$.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.4 times Ecuador's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 51st and Oman ranks 48th of 74 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2348 current US$ | 1.72 current US$ | 1.48 current US$ | Oman |
| 2000s | 0.2083 current US$ | 0.7933 current US$ | 0.585 current US$ | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver, Ecuador or Oman?
- Oman, at 0.5386 current US$ against 0.377 current US$ in Ecuador as of 2002.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver between Ecuador and Oman?
- 0.1616 current US$, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Oman?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2002.
- How do Ecuador and Oman rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver?
- Ecuador ranks 51st and Oman ranks 48th of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.