China vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver
China
6.99 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
3.88 current US$
in 2016
China rank
30th
Serbia rank
33rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver over time
- China
- Serbia
How they compare
China currently reports 6.99 current US$ against 3.88 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 3.11 current US$.
That makes China's figure about 1.8 times Serbia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 30th and Serbia ranks 33rd of 74 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.94 current US$ | 2.39 current US$ | 3.55 current US$ | China |
| 2010s | 10.89 current US$ | 5.29 current US$ | 5.6 current US$ | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver, China or Serbia?
- China, at 6.99 current US$ against 3.88 current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver between China and Serbia?
- 3.11 current US$, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do China and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver?
- China ranks 30th and Serbia ranks 33rd of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.