China vs Kyrgyzstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver
China
6.99 current US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan
7.67 current US$
in 2020
China rank
30th
Kyrgyzstan rank
28th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver over time
- China
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 7.67 current US$ against 6.99 current US$ in China, a difference of 0.68 current US$.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was China ahead.
China ranks 30th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 28th of 74 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.2 current US$ | 3.68 current US$ | 5.53 current US$ | China |
| 2020s | 6.99 current US$ | 7.67 current US$ | 0.6792 current US$ | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver, China or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 7.67 current US$ against 6.99 current US$ in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver between China and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.68 current US$, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do China and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver?
- China ranks 30th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 28th of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.