Burkina Faso vs Chile: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals

Burkina Faso
0.0065 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chile
0.0205 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Burkina Faso rank
26th
Chile rank
24th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Chile
00.020.040.060.08199520072020

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0205 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.0065 real chained 2019 US$ in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.014 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Chile's figure about 3.2 times Burkina Faso's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 26th and Chile ranks 24th of 145 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0175 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0828 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0654 real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2000s 0.0133 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0603 real chained 2019 US$ 0.047 real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2010s 0.0082 real chained 2019 US$ 0.029 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0208 real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2020s 0.0065 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0205 real chained 2019 US$ 0.014 real chained 2019 US$ Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Burkina Faso or Chile?
Chile, at 0.0205 real chained 2019 US$ against 0.0065 real chained 2019 US$ in Burkina Faso as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Burkina Faso and Chile?
0.014 real chained 2019 US$, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Chile?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Burkina Faso and Chile rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
Burkina Faso ranks 26th and Chile ranks 24th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Chile: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-real-chained-2019-us/burkina-faso/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-real-chained-2019-us/burkina-faso/chile/">Burkina Faso vs Chile: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed