Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Sri Lanka
0 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
0 current US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka rank
16th
Tunisia rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Sri Lanka
- Tunisia
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Tunisia ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 16th and Tunisia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 1.66 current US$ | 232.38 current US$ | 230.71 current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 2.19 current US$ | 178.92 current US$ | 176.73 current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Sri Lanka or Tunisia?
- Sri Lanka, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 0 current US$, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Sri Lanka and Tunisia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Sri Lanka ranks 16th and Tunisia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.