Saudi Arabia vs Thailand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Saudi Arabia
0 current US$
in 2020
Thailand
0.0017 current US$
in 2017
Saudi Arabia rank
16th
Thailand rank
15th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 0.0017 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.0017 current US$.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Saudi Arabia ranks 16th and Thailand ranks 15th of 41 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.12 current US$ | 0.0551 current US$ | 13.07 current US$ | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 89.17 current US$ | 0.1157 current US$ | 89.05 current US$ | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Saudi Arabia or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 0.0017 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Saudi Arabia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Saudi Arabia and Thailand?
- 0.0017 current US$, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Thailand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Thailand rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 16th and Thailand ranks 15th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.