Peru vs Thailand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Peru
0 current US$
in 2020
Thailand
0.0017 current US$
in 2017
Peru rank
16th
Thailand rank
15th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Peru
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 0.0017 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 0.0017 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Thailand ahead.
Peru ranks 16th and Thailand ranks 15th of 41 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 0.5876 current US$ | 0.0264 current US$ | 0.5612 current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 97.96 current US$ | 0.1157 current US$ | 97.84 current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Peru or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 0.0017 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru as of 2017.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Peru and Thailand?
- 0.0017 current US$, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Thailand?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
- How do Peru and Thailand rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Peru ranks 16th and Thailand ranks 15th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.