Peru vs Russia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Peru
0 current US$
in 2020
Russia
0 current US$
in 2020
Peru rank
16th
Russia rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Peru
- Russia
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Russia, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Russia ahead.
Peru ranks 16th and Russia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 0.5876 current US$ | 19.01 current US$ | 18.42 current US$ | Russia |
| 2010s | 60.7 current US$ | 67.63 current US$ | 6.92 current US$ | Russia |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Peru or Russia?
- Peru, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Russia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Peru and Russia?
- 0 current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Russia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Peru and Russia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Peru ranks 16th and Russia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.