Mali vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Mali
0.3701 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
0.2513 current US$
in 2020
Mali rank
10th
Zimbabwe rank
11th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Mali
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Mali currently reports 0.3701 current US$ against 0.2513 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1188 current US$.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Mali ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 41 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.18 current US$ | 2.72 current US$ | 1.55 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.3701 current US$ | 0.2513 current US$ | 0.1188 current US$ | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Mali or Zimbabwe?
- Mali, at 0.3701 current US$ against 0.2513 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Mali and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1188 current US$, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zimbabwe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mali and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Mali ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.