Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Malawi
0.0373 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
0.2513 current US$
in 2020
Malawi rank
13th
Zimbabwe rank
11th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Malawi
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.2513 current US$ against 0.0373 current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 0.214 current US$.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 6.7 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Malawi ranks 13th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 41 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5576 current US$ | 1.45 current US$ | 0.8967 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.0373 current US$ | 0.2513 current US$ | 0.214 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.2513 current US$ against 0.0373 current US$ in Malawi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 0.214 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Malawi ranks 13th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.