Malawi vs Saudi Arabia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Malawi
0.0373 current US$
in 2020
Saudi Arabia
0 current US$
in 2020
Malawi rank
13th
Saudi Arabia rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Malawi
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.0373 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.0373 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Malawi ranks 13th and Saudi Arabia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5576 current US$ | 75 current US$ | 74.44 current US$ | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 0.0373 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0.0373 current US$ | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Malawi or Saudi Arabia?
- Malawi, at 0.0373 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Saudi Arabia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Malawi and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.0373 current US$, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Saudi Arabia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Malawi and Saudi Arabia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Malawi ranks 13th and Saudi Arabia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.