Luxembourg vs Morocco: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Luxembourg
564.23 current US$
in 2014
Morocco
355.77 current US$
in 2020
Luxembourg rank
1st
Morocco rank
2nd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Luxembourg
- Morocco
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 564.23 current US$ against 355.77 current US$ in Morocco, a difference of 208.46 current US$.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.6 times Morocco's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Morocco ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 1st and Morocco ranks 2nd of 41 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 779.06 current US$ | 632.74 current US$ | 146.33 current US$ | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 1,429 current US$ | 1,672 current US$ | 242.83 current US$ | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Luxembourg or Morocco?
- Luxembourg, at 564.23 current US$ against 355.77 current US$ in Morocco as of 2014.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Luxembourg and Morocco?
- 208.46 current US$, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Morocco?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2014.
- How do Luxembourg and Morocco rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Luxembourg ranks 1st and Morocco ranks 2nd of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.