Iraq vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Iraq
0 current US$
in 2014
Peru
0 current US$
in 2020
Iraq rank
16th
Peru rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Iraq
- Peru
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 16th and Peru ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 0.1348 current US$ | 0.5876 current US$ | 0.4528 current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 5.03 current US$ | 113.59 current US$ | 108.56 current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Iraq or Peru?
- Iraq, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru as of 2014.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Iraq and Peru?
- 0 current US$, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Peru?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2014.
- How do Iraq and Peru rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Iraq ranks 16th and Peru ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.