France vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
France
0.4983 current US$
in 2014
Zimbabwe
0.2513 current US$
in 2020
France rank
9th
Zimbabwe rank
11th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- France
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
France currently reports 0.4983 current US$ against 0.2513 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.247 current US$.
That makes France's figure about 2.0 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
France ranks 9th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 41 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 0.6263 current US$ | 2.07 current US$ | 1.45 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 1.21 current US$ | 4.33 current US$ | 3.12 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, France or Zimbabwe?
- France, at 0.4983 current US$ against 0.2513 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between France and Zimbabwe?
- 0.247 current US$, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Zimbabwe?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2014.
- How do France and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- France ranks 9th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.