France vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
France
0.4983 current US$
in 2014
South Africa
4.82 current US$
in 2020
France rank
9th
South Africa rank
8th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- France
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 4.82 current US$ against 0.4983 current US$ in France, a difference of 4.32 current US$.
That makes South Africa's figure about 9.7 times France's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
France ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 8th of 41 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 0.6263 current US$ | 39.02 current US$ | 38.39 current US$ | South Africa |
| 2010s | 1.21 current US$ | 82.27 current US$ | 81.06 current US$ | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, France or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 4.82 current US$ against 0.4983 current US$ in France as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between France and South Africa?
- 4.32 current US$, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and South Africa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2014.
- How do France and South Africa rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- France ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 8th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.