Finland vs Morocco: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Finland
81.08 current US$
in 2020
Morocco
355.77 current US$
in 2020
Finland rank
3rd
Morocco rank
2nd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Finland
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 355.77 current US$ against 81.08 current US$ in Finland, a difference of 274.69 current US$.
That makes Morocco's figure about 4.4 times Finland's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 3rd and Morocco ranks 2nd of 41 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 134.45 current US$ | 632.74 current US$ | 498.28 current US$ | Morocco |
| 2010s | 250.91 current US$ | 1,165 current US$ | 913.69 current US$ | Morocco |
| 2020s | 81.08 current US$ | 355.77 current US$ | 274.7 current US$ | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Finland or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 355.77 current US$ against 81.08 current US$ in Finland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Finland and Morocco?
- 274.69 current US$, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Morocco?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Morocco rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Finland ranks 3rd and Morocco ranks 2nd of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.