Finland vs Luxembourg: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Finland
81.08 current US$
in 2020
Luxembourg
564.23 current US$
in 2014
Finland rank
3rd
Luxembourg rank
1st
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Finland
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 564.23 current US$ against 81.08 current US$ in Finland, a difference of 483.15 current US$.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 7.0 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Finland ranks 3rd and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 41 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 134.45 current US$ | 779.06 current US$ | 644.61 current US$ | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 342.7 current US$ | 1,429 current US$ | 1,086 current US$ | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Finland or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 564.23 current US$ against 81.08 current US$ in Finland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Finland and Luxembourg?
- 483.15 current US$, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Luxembourg?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2014.
- How do Finland and Luxembourg rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Finland ranks 3rd and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.