Egypt vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Egypt
0 current US$
in 2020
Peru
0 current US$
in 2020
Egypt rank
16th
Peru rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Egypt
- Peru
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Peru ahead.
Egypt ranks 16th and Peru ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 16.59 current US$ | 0.5876 current US$ | 16.01 current US$ | Egypt |
| 2010s | 36.36 current US$ | 60.7 current US$ | 24.34 current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Egypt or Peru?
- Egypt, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Egypt and Peru?
- 0 current US$, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Peru?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Egypt and Peru rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Egypt ranks 16th and Peru ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.