Egypt vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Egypt
0 current US$
in 2020
Kazakhstan
0 current US$
in 2020
Egypt rank
16th
Kazakhstan rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Egypt
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Egypt ranks 16th and Kazakhstan ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 28.01 current US$ | 62.22 current US$ | 34.21 current US$ | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 36.36 current US$ | 100.11 current US$ | 63.75 current US$ | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Egypt or Kazakhstan?
- Egypt, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Egypt and Kazakhstan?
- 0 current US$, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Kazakhstan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Egypt and Kazakhstan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Egypt ranks 16th and Kazakhstan ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.