Colombia vs Philippines: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Colombia
0 current US$
in 2020
Philippines
0 current US$
in 2020
Colombia rank
16th
Philippines rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Colombia
- Philippines
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Philippines, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Philippines ahead.
Colombia ranks 16th and Philippines ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 0.59 current US$ | 0.0186 current US$ | 0.5715 current US$ | Colombia |
| 2010s | 0.4907 current US$ | 0.0237 current US$ | 0.467 current US$ | Colombia |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Colombia or Philippines?
- Colombia, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Colombia and Philippines?
- 0 current US$, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Philippines?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Philippines rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Colombia ranks 16th and Philippines ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.