Colombia vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Colombia
0 current US$
in 2020
Peru
0 current US$
in 2020
Colombia rank
16th
Peru rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Colombia
- Peru
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 16th and Peru ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 0.2745 current US$ | 0.5876 current US$ | 0.3131 current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.4907 current US$ | 60.7 current US$ | 60.21 current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Colombia or Peru?
- Colombia, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Colombia and Peru?
- 0 current US$, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Peru?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Peru rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Colombia ranks 16th and Peru ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.