Chile vs Philippines: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Chile
0 current US$
in 2020
Philippines
0 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
16th
Philippines rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Chile
- Philippines
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Philippines, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Philippines ahead.
Chile ranks 16th and Philippines ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 0.5655 current US$ | 0.0186 current US$ | 0.5469 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.4393 current US$ | 0.0237 current US$ | 0.4155 current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Chile or Philippines?
- Chile, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Chile and Philippines?
- 0 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Philippines?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Philippines rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Chile ranks 16th and Philippines ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.