Chile vs Indonesia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Chile
0 current US$
in 2020
Indonesia
0.003 current US$
in 2015
Chile rank
16th
Indonesia rank
14th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Chile
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 0.003 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 0.003 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Indonesia ahead.
Chile ranks 16th and Indonesia ranks 14th of 41 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 0.5655 current US$ | 0.002 current US$ | 0.5635 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.7131 current US$ | 0.0043 current US$ | 0.7088 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Chile or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 0.003 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Chile as of 2015.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Chile and Indonesia?
- 0.003 current US$, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Indonesia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2015.
- How do Chile and Indonesia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Chile ranks 16th and Indonesia ranks 14th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.