Canada vs France: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Canada
9.27 current US$
in 2013
France
0.4983 current US$
in 2014
Canada rank
7th
France rank
9th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Canada
- France
How they compare
Canada currently reports 9.27 current US$ against 0.4983 current US$ in France, a difference of 8.77 current US$.
That makes Canada's figure about 18.6 times France's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was France ahead.
Canada ranks 7th and France ranks 9th of 41 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | France | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.78 current US$ | 0.6263 current US$ | 7.15 current US$ | Canada |
| 2010s | 5.73 current US$ | 1.39 current US$ | 4.35 current US$ | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Canada or France?
- Canada, at 9.27 current US$ against 0.4983 current US$ in France as of 2013.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Canada and France?
- 8.77 current US$, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and France?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
- How do Canada and France rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Canada ranks 7th and France ranks 9th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.