Burkina Faso vs Malawi: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Burkina Faso
0 current US$
in 2020
Malawi
0.0373 current US$
in 2020
Burkina Faso rank
16th
Malawi rank
13th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Burkina Faso
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.0373 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.0373 current US$.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 16th and Malawi ranks 13th of 41 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0751 current US$ | 0.5576 current US$ | 0.4825 current US$ | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0.0373 current US$ | 0.0373 current US$ | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Burkina Faso or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 0.0373 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Burkina Faso as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Burkina Faso and Malawi?
- 0.0373 current US$, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Malawi?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Burkina Faso and Malawi rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Burkina Faso ranks 16th and Malawi ranks 13th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.