Brazil vs China: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Brazil
0 current US$
in 2020
China
0 current US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
16th
China rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Brazil
- China
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in China, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 16th and China ranks 16th of 41 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 20.72 current US$ | 31.69 current US$ | 10.98 current US$ | China |
| 2010s | 17.38 current US$ | 50.7 current US$ | 33.32 current US$ | China |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Brazil or China?
- Brazil, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Brazil and China?
- 0 current US$, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and China rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Brazil ranks 16th and China ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.