Australia vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals
Australia
0 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
0 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
16th
Tunisia rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals over time
- Australia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 16th and Tunisia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 57.77 current US$ | 232.38 current US$ | 174.61 current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 49.63 current US$ | 178.92 current US$ | 129.29 current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals, Australia or Tunisia?
- Australia, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals between Australia and Tunisia?
- 0 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Tunisia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Tunisia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals?
- Australia ranks 16th and Tunisia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.